QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

For the transition period from __________________ to _____________________

Commission File No.000-31355

BEACON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

124 North First Street, Louisville, KY 40202
(Address of principal executive offices)

502-379-4788
(Issuer’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [   ] No [X]

As of August 10, 2008, Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. had a total of 11,280,521 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Transitional small business disclosure format: Yes [   ] No [X]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

2

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

BEACON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – THE COMPANY

Organization

     The condensed consolidated financial statements presented are those of Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. (“Beacon” or the “Company”), which was originally formed in the State of Indiana on June 6, 2007 and combined with Suncrest Global Energy Corp. (“Suncrest” or the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, on December 20, 2007, as described in “Share Exchange Transaction,” below.

     The Company is a unified, single source information technology and telecommunications enterprise that provides professional services and sales of information technology and telecommunications products to mid-market commercial businesses, state and local government agencies, and educational institutions.

     The Company was formed for the purpose of acquiring and consolidating regional telecom businesses and service platforms into an integrated, national provider of high quality voice, data and VOIP communications to small and medium-sized business enterprises (the "SME Market"). The Company's business strategy is to acquire companies that will allow it to serve the SME Market on an integrated, turn-key basis from system design, procurement and installation through all aspects of providing network service and designing and hosting network applications.

     The Company was a development stage enterprise with no operating history until completing the Share Exchange Transaction described below and simultaneous business combinations and Private Placement financing transaction described in Notes 4 and 14, respectively. Accordingly, there is no comparative financial information to present for the period of June 6, 2007 through June 30, 2007 because the Company had no activity during that 25 day period.

Share Exchange Transaction

     Pursuant to a Securities Exchange Agreement, Suncrest acquired all of the outstanding no par value common stock of the Company on December 20, 2007. Suncrest, in exchange for such Company common stock issued 1 share of its own $0.001 par value common stock directly to the Company’s stockholders for each share of their Company common stock (the “Share Exchange Transaction”). Following the Share Exchange Transaction, the existing stockholders of Suncrest retained 1,273,121 shares of Suncrest’s outstanding common stock and the Company’s stockholders became the majority owners of Suncrest. Suncrest was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 22, 2000. The Company paid a $305,000 fee to the stockholders of Suncrest in connection with completing the Share Exchange Transaction which is included as a component of selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

     Prior to the Share Exchange Transaction, Suncrest was a publicly-traded corporation with nominal operations of its own. Pursuant to the merger, Suncrest was the surviving legal entity and Beacon was its wholly-owned subsidiary. Following the Share Exchange Transaction, Suncrest changed its name to Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. on February 15, 2008 and continued to carry on the operations of Beacon. The Share Exchange Transaction has been accounted for as a reverse merger and recapitalization transaction in which the original Beacon is deemed to be the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements present the historical financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Beacon, adjusted to give retroactive effect to the recapitalization of Beacon into Suncrest.

7

Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and for the three and nine months then ended have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and on the same basis as the annual audited consolidated financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008, condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and the condensed consolidated statement of stockholders’ (deficit) equity and cash flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 are unaudited, but include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for the period presented. The Company was inactive during the period from inception on June 6, 2007 to June 30, 2007. The results for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending September 30, 2008 or for any future interim period. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, which was filed with the SEC on December 28, 2007.

NOTE 2 - LIQUIDITY, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND MANAGEMENT'S PLANS

     The Company incurred a net loss of approximately $3,160,000 and used approximately $1,844,000 of cash in its operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008. At June 30, 2008, the Company's accumulated deficit amounted to approximately $7,349,000. The Company had cash of $126,827 and a working capital deficit of approximately $1,552,000 at June 30, 2008.

     On June 14, 2007, the Company signed a non-exclusive engagement agreement with Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. ("Laidlaw") in which Laidlaw agreed to provide the Company with certain corporate finance advisory services including (i) raising capital under the Private Placement transaction described in Note 14; (ii) structuring the business combinations described in Note 4; and (iii) assisting the Company with identifying the public company in the Share Exchange Transaction described in Notes 1 and 14. These transactions were completed on December 20, 2007. The Company raised $4.0 million in the private placement in three separate closings on December 20, 2007, January 15, 2008, and February 12, 2008. Pursuant to an oversubscription of the initial Private Placement, the Company closed on an additional $0.8 million follow-on placement referred to herein as the “Series A-1 Placement,” completed on March 11, 2008. The Company assumed approximately $405,000 of debt obligations in which the sellers of one of the acquired businesses described in Note 4 triggered an acceleration of principal under certain change of ownership provisions that constituted an event of default under those agreements which was subsequently refinanced on March 14, 2008 (Note 10).

     As described in Note 10, the Company received $500,000 of gross proceeds ($278,000 prior to September 30, 2007 and $222,000 during the nine months ended June 30, 2008) under a bridge financing facility furnished by two of its founding stockholders, who are also members of the Board of Directors. The Company also raised $200,000 of additional capital through the issuance of bridge notes in a second bridge note transaction completed on November 15, 2007. The Bridge Noteholders agreed to defer payment of the principal to April 1, 2009. As discussed in Note 12, the Company also has up to $500,000 of additional equity financing available to it from one of its directors to draw as an additional source of funding if needed. In addition, the Company entered into a $200,000 short-term note on June 11, 2008 due August 11, 2008 collateralized by certain fully executed contracts which was paid in full on its due date. On July 25, 2008, the Company engaged a registered broker-dealer in a private placement of Common Stock and Warrants and has raised $650,000 as of August 19, 2008. The Company secured an additional $2,500,000 put right from one of its directors on August 19, 2008 as an additional source of funding if needed.

8

     The Company believes that its currently available cash, the equity financing arrangement and funds it expects to generate from operations will enable it to effectively operate its business and pay its debt obligations as they become due within the next twelve months through July 1, 2009. However, the Company will require additional capital in order to execute its current business plan. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital, it will be required to take various measures to conserve liquidity, which could include, but not necessarily be limited to, curtailing its business development activities, suspending the pursuit of its business plan, and controlling overhead expenses. The Company cannot provide any assurance that it will raise additional capital. The Company has not secured any commitments for new financing at this time, nor can it provide any assurance that new financing will be available to it on acceptable terms, if at all.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

     The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (formerly Suncrest) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries the original Beacon formed in Indiana in June 2007 and BH Acquisition Corp. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

     The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Due to their short-term nature, cash equivalents, when they are carried, are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Revenue and Cost Recognition

     The Company applies the revenue recognition principles set forth under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104 with respect to all of its revenue. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is probable.

     Business Telephone System and Computer Hardware Product Revenues - The Company requires its hardware product sales to be supported by a written contract or other evidence of a sale transaction that clearly indicates the selling price to the customer, shipping terms, payment terms (generally 30 days) and refund policy, if any. Since the Company’s hardware sales are supported by a contract or other document that clearly indicates the terms of the transaction, and the selling price is fixed at the time the sale is consummated, the Company records revenue on these sales at the time at which it receives a confirmation that the goods were tendered at their destination when shipped “FOB destination,” or upon confirmation that shipment has occurred when shipped “FOB shipping point.” For product sales, the Company applies the factors discussed in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issue 99-19 “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal vs. Net as an Agent,” (“99-19”), in determining whether to recognize product revenues on a gross or net basis. In a substantial majority of these transactions, the Company acts as principal because; (i) it has latitude in establishing selling prices; (ii) takes title to the products; and (iii) has the risks and rewards of ownership, including the risk of loss for collection, delivery or returns. For these transactions, the Company recognizes revenues based on the gross amounts billed to customers.

     Professional Services Revenue - The Company generally bills its customers for professional telecommunications and data consulting services based on hours of time spent on any given assignment at its hourly billing rates. As it relates to delivery of these services, the Company recognizes revenue under these arrangements as the work is completed and the customer has indicated their acceptance of services by approving a work order

9

milestone or completion order. For certain engagements, the Company enters into fixed bid contracts, and recognizes revenue as phases of the project are completed and accepted by the client. We generated approximately $1,042,000 and $2,075,000 of professional services revenue during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

     Time and Materials Contracts – Revenues from time and materials contracts, which generally include product sales and installation services, are billed when services are completed based on fixed labor rates plus materials. A substantial majority of the Company’s services in this category are completed in short periods of time. The Company may, on occasion, enter into long-term contracts in which it would be appropriate to recognize revenue using long-term contract accounting such as the percentage of completion method. We generated revenues of approximately $1,314,000 and $1,964,000 from short-term time and materials contracts for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

     Maintenance Contracts – The Company, as a representative of various original equipment manufacturers, sells extended maintenance contracts on equipment it sells and also acts as an authorized servicing agent with respect to these contracts. These contracts, which are sold as separate agreements from other products and services, are individually negotiated and are generally not bundled with other products and services. For maintenance contract sales, the Company applies the factors discussed in “EITF” 99-19 in determining whether to recognize product revenues on a gross or net basis. Maintenance contracts are typically manufacturer maintenance contracts that are sold to the customer on a reseller basis. Based on an analysis of the factors set forth in EITF 99-19, the Company has determined that it acts as an agent in these situations, and therefore recognizes revenues on a net basis. The Company’s share of revenue that it earns from originating these contracts is deferred and recognized over the life of the contract. Material and labor is charged for any service calls under these maintenance contracts on a time and materials basis which is charged to either the customer or manufacturer. We recognized approximately $9,000 and $35,000 of net maintenance revenue during both the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008.

     Revenue of approximately $166,000 was recorded related to certain contracts for which the customer requested the Company bill and hold materials to secure the price of the materials from further price increases related to inflation in commodities underlying the materials.

     The Company accounts for sales taxes collected on behalf of government authorities using the net method. Pursuant to this method, sales taxes are included in the amounts receivable and a payable is recorded for the amounts due to the government agencies.

Use of Estimates

     The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. These estimates and assumptions include valuing equity securities and derivative financial instruments issued as purchase consideration in business combinations and/or in financing transactions and in share based payment arrangements, accounts receivable reserves, inventory reserves, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, allocating the purchase price to the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations (including separately identifiable intangible assets and goodwill) and estimating the fair values of long lived assets to assess whether impairment charges may be necessary.

Accounts Receivable

     The Company has a policy of reserving for uncollectible accounts based on its best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses on its existing accounts receivable. Account balances deemed to be uncollectible are charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. Historically, the companies acquired in the business combinations described in Note 4 have experienced minimal credit losses. We currently believe the majority of our receivables are collectible

10

due to the nature of the industry and the substantial customer deposits initially received at contract inception. We have established an allowance for doubtful accounts as an estimate of potential credit risk due to current market conditions.

Inventory

     Inventory, which consists of business telephone systems and associated equipment and parts, is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. In the case of slow moving items, we may write down or calculate a reserve to reflect a reduced marketability for the item. The actual percentage reserved will depend on the total quantity on hand, its sales history, and expected near term sales prospects. When we discontinue sales of a product, we will write down the value of inventory to an amount equal to its estimated net realizable value less all applicable disposition costs. Slow moving items include spare parts for older phone systems that the Company uses to repair or upgrade customer phone systems. A portion of these items, which are stated at their net realizable value, are likely to be used after the next twelve months and are therefore presented as non-current inventory in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. A significant portion of the inventory on hand at June 30, 2008 was acquired in the business combinations completed on December 20, 2007. These goods are stated at the net realizable value established using the purchase method of accounting (Note 4) less a reserve for obsolete inventory as phone systems for which we carry spare parts are discontinued and diminish in the marketplace.

Property and Equipment

     Property and equipment is stated at cost, including any cost to place the property into service, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets which currently range from 2 to 5 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of the lease.

Concentration of Credit Risk

     Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. We maintain our cash accounts at high quality financial institutions with balances, at times, in excess of federally insured limits. As of June 30, 2008, we had no deposits in excess of federally insured limits. Management believes that the financial institutions that hold our deposits are financially sound and therefore pose minimal credit risk.

Start Up Costs

     All expenses incurred in connection with our formation and related start up activities have been expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Start up costs, which principally include professional fees and other administrative costs amounted to approximately $127,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and are included in selling general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

     The Company accounts for goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” (“SFAS 142). SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite lives should be tested for impairment annually or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of an asset has decreased below its carrying value.

     Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. SFAS 142, requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating

11

segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests when circumstances indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount of goodwill may be in doubt. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units, and determining the fair value. The Company operates a single reporting unit. Significant judgments required to estimate the fair value of reporting units include estimating future cash flows, determining appropriate discount rates and other assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment.

     The Company’s amortizable intangible assets include customer relationships, covenants not to compete and tradenames. These costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The estimated fair values and useful lives of the customer relationships, non-compete agreements and tradenames are preliminary as of June 30, 2008 as established by the Company using the purchase method of accounting. These amounts will be adjusted when the Company completes its valuation.

     In accordance with SFAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company reviews the carrying value of intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

     Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the undiscounted cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property, if any, exceeds its fair market value.

Preferred Stock

     We apply the guidance enumerated in SFAS No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” and EITF Topic D-98 “Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities,” when determining the classification and measurement of preferred stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS 150. All other issuances of preferred stock are subject to the classification and measurement principles of EITF Topic D-98. Accordingly we classify conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within our control, as temporary equity. At all other times, we classify our preferred shares in stockholders’ equity. Our preferred shares do not feature any redemption rights within the holders control or conditional redemption features not within our control as of June 30, 2008. Accordingly all issuances of preferred stock are presented as a component of condensed consolidated stockholders’ (deficit) equity.

Convertible Instruments

     We evaluate and account for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”) and EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock” (“EITF 00-19”).

     SFAS 133 generally provides three criteria that, if met, require companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments in accordance with EITF 00-19. These three criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not remeasured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument subject to the requirements of SFAS

12

133. SFAS 133 and EITF 00-19 also provide an exception to this rule when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional (as that term is described in the implementation guidance to SFAS 133 and further clarified in EITF 05-2, “The Meaning of “Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument” in Issue No. 00-19”).

     We account for convertible instruments (when we have determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments) in accordance with the provisions of EITF 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features” (“EITF 98-5”) and EITF 00-27, “Application of EITF 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments” (“EITF 00-27”). Accordingly, we record when necessary discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their stated date of redemption. We also record when necessary deemed dividends for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in preferred shares based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the preferred shares.

     We evaluated the conversion option featured in the Bridge Financing Facility and Bridge Notes that are more fully described in Note 10. These conversion options provide the noteholders, of whom three are also founding stockholders and/or directors of Beacon, with the right to convert any advances outstanding under the facility, into shares of our common stock at anytime upon or after the completion of the entire Private Placement described in Note 14. The conversion options embedded in these notes would not have been exercisable unless and until we raised the full $4,000,000 of proceeds stipulated in the Private Placement that was commenced during the three months ended December 31, 2007 and completed during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.

     We had deemed the completion of the entire Private Placement to be an event that was not within our control. As described in Note 10, we completed our Private Placement on February 12, 2008 at which time the conversion options embedded in the Notes became exercisable at the option of the holders. Accordingly, we recorded a $72,000 discount to the face value of the Bridge Notes based on the relative fair values of the Bridge Warrants and the Notes measured as of the commitment date on November 15, 2007 and an additional $128,000 discount related to the beneficial conversion feature that is being accreted to interest expense over the contractual term of the Notes.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Other Derivative Financial Instruments

     We account for the issuance of common stock purchase warrants and other free standing derivative financial instruments in accordance with the provisions of EITF 00-19. Based on the provisions of EITF 00-19, we classify as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives us a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in our own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). We classify as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside our control) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). We assess classification of our common stock purchase warrants and other free standing derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities is required.

     Our free standing derivatives consist of warrants to purchase common stock that were issued to three founding stockholders/directors and one independent qualified investor in connection with the Bridge Financing Facility and Bridge Notes described in Note 10, warrants issued pursuant to equity financing arrangements described in Note 12, warrants issued to the Series A and A-1 Preferred Stock stockholders, and warrants issued to the placement agent and its affiliates in connection with the Private Placements described in Note 14. We evaluated the common stock purchase warrants to assess their proper classification in the balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 using

13

the applicable classification criteria enumerated in EITF 00-19. We determined that the common stock purchase warrants do not feature any characteristics permitting net cash settlement at the option of the holders. Accordingly, these instruments have been classified in stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008.

Share-Based Payments

     We account for stock-based compensation using Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123(R)”), as amended, which results in the recognition of compensation expense for stock-based compensation. The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method, which requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The recognized expense is net of expected forfeitures and restatement of prior periods is not required. The fair value of restricted stock is determined based on the number of shares granted and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on date of grant.

Income Taxes

     We account for income taxes under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). SFAS 109 requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for both the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and tax credit carry forwards. SFAS 109 additionally requires a valuation allowance to be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. Furthermore, SFAS 109 provides that it is difficult to conclude that a valuation allowance is not needed when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in recent years. Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall assessment. Accordingly, we have recorded a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. In addition, we expect to provide a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to utilize the assets, or other significant positive evidence arises that suggests our ability to utilize such assets. We will continue to re-assess our reserves on deferred income tax assets in future periods on a quarterly basis.

     Effective June 6, 2007 (date of inception), we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on the derecognition of income tax liabilities, classification of interest and penalties on income taxes, and accounting for uncertain tax positions in interim period financial statements. Our policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax provisions as a component of our income tax expense.

     As described in Note 15, we completed our preliminary assessment of uncertain tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 during the period of June 6, 2007 through September 30, 2007 and for the nine months June 30, 2008, including the effects of the Share Exchange Transaction described in Note 1 and business combinations completed as described in Note 4. Based on this preliminary assessment, we have determined that we have no material uncertain income tax positions requiring recognition or disclosure in accordance with FIN 48.

Net Loss Per Share

14

     Net loss per share is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 128 “Earnings Per Share." (“SFAS 128”) Under SFAS 128, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss per share available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period and excludes any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur upon the exercise or conversion of all dilutive securities into common stock. The computation of loss per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 excludes potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

     Shares of common stock issuable upon conversion or exercise of potentially dilutive securities at June 30, 2008 are as follows:

     The table above includes 266,000 contingently exercisable common stock purchase warrants issued to the bridge financing participants (Note 10).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

     The carrying amounts reported in the financial statements for cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of the bridge notes, long-term debt and capital lease obligations approximate fair value because the contractual interest rates or the effective yields of such instruments, which includes the effects of contractual interest rates taken together with the concurrent issuance of common stock purchase warrants, are consistent with current market rates of interest for instruments of comparable credit risk.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a market based framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 157 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

     In February 2008, SFAS 157 was amended by FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157: Fair Value Measurements” (“FSP 157-2”). As such, SFAS 157 (as amended) is partially effective for measurements and disclosures of financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is fully effective for measurement and disclosure provisions on all

15

applicable assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that FSP 157-2 will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

     On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). The guidance in SFAS 159 “allows” reporting entities to “choose” to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective underlying the development of this literature is to improve financial reporting by providing reporting entities with the opportunity to reduce volatility in reported earnings that results from measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions, using the guidance in SFAS 133, as amended. The provisions of SFAS 159 are applicable to all reporting entities and are effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins subsequent to November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

     In June 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits on Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 addresses share-based payment arrangements with dividend protection features that entitle employees to receive (a) dividends on equity-classified nonvested shares, (b) dividend equivalents on equity-classified nonvested share units, or (c) payments equal to the dividends paid on the underlying shares while an equity-classified share option is outstanding, when those dividends or dividend equivalents are charged to retained earnings under SFAS 123R and result in an income tax deduction for the employer. A realized income tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings are paid to employees for equity-classified nonvested shares, nonvested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should be recognized as an increase in additional paid in capital. The amount recognized in additional paid-in capital for the realized income tax benefit from dividends on those awards should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payments for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”), which replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for determining how an enterprise recognizes and measures the fair value of certain assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, including noncontrolling interests, contingent consideration, and certain acquired contingencies. SFAS 141R also requires acquisition-related transaction expenses and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a component of the business combination. SFAS 141R will be applicable prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141R will have an impact on the accounting for any businesses acquired after the effective date of this pronouncement.

     In December 2007, the SEC staff issued SAB No. 110 (“SAB 110”), “Share-Based Payment,” which amends SAB 107, “Share-Based Payment,” to permit public companies, under certain circumstances, to use the simplified method in SAB 107 for employee option grants after December 31, 2007. Use of the simplified method after December 2007 is permitted only for companies whose historical data about their employees’ exercise behavior does not provide a reasonable basis for estimating the expected term of the options. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as minority interests). SFAS 160 also requires that a retained noncontrolling interest upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at its

16

fair value. Upon adoption of SFAS 160, the Company would be required to report any noncontrolling interests as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company would also be required to present any net income allocable to noncontrolling interests and net income attributable to the stockholders of the Company separately in its consolidated statements of operations. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests. All other requirements of SFAS 160 shall be applied prospectively. SFAS 160 will have an impact on the presentation and disclosure of the noncontrolling interests of any non wholly-owned businesses after the effective date of this pronouncement.

     In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The guidance in SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

     In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statement of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” and is not anticipated to have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

     Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 4 – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Advanced Data Systems, Inc.

     On December 20, 2007, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “ADSnetcurve Agreement”), our acquisition of Advance Data Systems, Inc. (“ADSnetcurve”) became effective. The ADSnetcurve Agreement was entered into between us, ADSnertcurve and the shareholders of ADSnetcurve, whereby the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of ADSnetcurve. Contemporaneously with the acquisition of ADSnetcurve, certain employees of ADSnetcurve entered into employment agreements with us, effective upon the closing of the acquisition.

17

     ADSnetcurve is a global information technology company that provides technology solutions. Specifically, these services include web application development, IT management and hosting services (for scalable infrastructure solutions); and support services. The Company acquired ADSnetcurve because the business provides the software development and support infrastructure that is needed to develop custom applications for clients’ information technology systems, and to provide management, hosting and technical support services with respect to those systems.

     The aggregate purchase price paid by Beacon, inclusive of direct transaction expenses, in connection with the ADSnetcurve acquisition amounted to $1,727,548, including 700,000 shares of common stock valued at $.85 per share, $666,079 of cash, a $300,000 secured promissory note (“ADS Note”), and estimated direct transaction expenses of $172,345 net of $5,876 of cash acquired.

     The ADS Note (Note 10) has a term of 48 months, bearing interest at the prime rate, and is secured by the assets acquired by Beacon from ADSnetcurve. The ADS Note provides for monthly principal and interest payments of $7,219. The ADS Note also contains a pre-payment provision such that, following the initial Private Placement, we are required to make additional principal payments equal to 3.2% of the net amount received by us from any equity capital raised, in excess of $1,000,000, after the closing date until such time as the ADS Note has been paid in full. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made payments of $28,875 and $50,531 on this note representing $24,048 and $40,385 of principal and $4,807 and $10,146 of interest, respectively.

     If, from the closing date to the first anniversary of the closing of this transaction, the annual revenue generated by ADSnetcurve amounts to less than $1,800,000, then the balance due under the ADS Note will be reduced by up to 60% of its principal amount but will not be less than $120,000. As of June 30, 2008, Management believes that the ADS Note will not be adjusted to an amount less than $300,000 and has therefore included the entire amount of the note in the purchase consideration.

     The agreement was subject to a net working capital adjustment that was initially measured and later adjusted as of December 20, 2007. Based on the initial net working capital measurement, $116,049 was escrowed on December 20, 2007. On January 15, 2008, based on the final determination of net working capital, $66,079 was released to the sellers (included in cash consideration above) and the remaining balance was returned to the Company from escrow.

     Beginning December 21, 2007, the day immediately following the effective date of the transaction, the financial results of ADSnetcurve were consolidated with those of our business. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, whereby a preliminary valuation of the fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities of the acquired business was performed as of December 20, 2007. The excess of the purchase price over net assets acquired amounted to $614,384 and was recorded as goodwill. Other separately identifiable intangibles consisting of customer relationships, non-compete agreements and tradenames amounted to an aggregate of $962,027. The preliminary estimates of fair value will be adjusted as necessary when the final valuation is completed.

Bell-Haun Systems Inc.

     On December 20, 2007, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Bell-Haun Agreement”), our acquisition of Bell-Haun Systems, Inc. (“Bell-Haun”) became effective. The Bell-Haun Agreement was entered into between Beacon, BH Acquisition Sub, Inc. (the “Acquisition Sub”), Bell-Haun and Thomas Bell and Michael Haun, whereby, Bell-Haun merged with and into the Acquisition Sub, with the Acquisition Sub surviving the merger.

     Bell-Haun specializes in the installation, maintenance and ongoing support of business telephone systems, wireless services, voice messaging platforms and conference calling services to businesses throughout its region. The Company acquired Bell-Haun because it believes the business provides it with (i) a customer base and presence in the greater Columbus, Ohio region and (ii) an established presence in the market for products and services needed to design telecommunications infrastructures and implement such design plans and systems.

18

     The aggregate purchase price paid by Beacon, inclusive of direct transaction expenses, in connection with the Bell-Haun acquisition amounted to $794,100, including 500,000 shares of common stock valued at $.85 per share, $155,048 of cash, notes payable (the “Bell-Haun Notes”) in the amount $119,000, and future payments in the amount of $50,000 related to non-compete agreements that are included in the direct transaction costs of $95,052.

     The Bell-Haun Notes are payable over 60 months in installments of $2,413 including interest at 8% per annum with the first payment due and payable on January 19, 2009 (Note 10).

     The Bell-Haun Agreement also provides for the payment of up to $480,374 of additional purchase consideration upon the attainment of certain earnings milestones based on gross profit earned over the twelve months following the anniversary of the closing. These payments are being accounted for as contingent consideration that would be recorded as an increase to goodwill at December 20, 2008, the measurement date of the milestone if such milestones are attained.

     Beginning December 21, 2007, the day immediately following the effective date of the transaction, the financial results of Bell-Haun Systems Inc. were consolidated with those of our business. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, whereby a preliminary valuation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was performed as of December 20, 2007. The aggregate amount of the purchase price which amounted to $794,100 plus the amount of the net liabilities assumed which amounted to $599,520 (grand total of $1,393,620), was allocated to goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill initially amounted to approximately $520,000, subsequently adjusted to approximately $416,000 as of June 30, 2008, upon continued review of the fair values of assets purchased and liabilities assumed, and separately identifiable intangibles consisting of customer relationships and non-compete agreements amounted to an aggregate of $873,760. The preliminary estimates will be adjusted as necessary when the final valuation is completed.

     As described in Notes 2 and 10, the Company assumed approximately $405,000 of debt obligations in this transaction that were in default as of the closing due to certain change of control restrictions that the sellers breached upon the transfer or their shares to the Company. These debt obligations were refinanced on March 14, 2008.

CETCON, Inc.

     On December 20, 2007, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “CETCON Agreement”), our acquisition of CETCON, Inc. (“CETCON”) became effective. The CETCON Agreement was entered into between Beacon, CETCON and the shareholders of CETCON, whereby we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of CETCON. Contemporaneously with acquisition of CETCON, certain employees of CETCON entered into employment agreements with us, effective upon the closing of the acquisition.

     CETCON provides engineering consulting services to commercial and government entities with respect to the design and implementation of their voice, data, video, and security infrastructures and systems. The Company acquired CETCON because the business provides systems design and engineering services that include evaluating information technology needs (including voice, data, video, and security needs) and also designs and engineers systems(i.e., hardware) and infrastructure (i.e., cabling and connectivity) to meet those needs at the enterprise level.

     The aggregate purchase price paid by Beacon, inclusive of direct transaction expenses, in connection with the CETCON acquisition amounted to $2,158,111, including 900,000 shares of common stock valued at $.85 per share, $700,000 of cash, a $600,000 secured promissory note (the “CETCON Note”) and direct transaction costs of $235,519 net of cash acquired of $142,407.

     The CETCON Note (Note 10) has a term of 60 months, bearing interest at 8% APR. The CETCON Note provides for monthly principal and interest payments in the amount of $12,166 and is secured by the assets acquired by us in this transaction (subordinate only to existing senior debt of $194,947 assumed in the acquisition which was repaid from proceeds of a new credit facility entered into on March 14, 2008 (Note 10)). If, from the closing date to October 31, 2008, the revenue generated from CETCON is less than $2,000,000, the principal amount of the CETCON Note will be reduced by the percentage of the actual revenue divided by $2,000,000. We believe that the

19

minimum revenue of $2,000,000 provided for in the CETCON Note for which there would be consideration payable is probable. Accordingly, the full principal amount of the CETCON Note is included in the purchase consideration paid to the seller as of the closing date of the acquisition. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made payments of $36,498 and $72,995 on this note representing $25,158 and $49,819 of principal and $11,340 and $23,176 of interest, respectively.

     We may prepay all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest under the CETCON Note. The CETCON Note contains a pre-payment provision such that, following the initial Private Placement, we are required to make additional principal payments equal to 3% of the net amount received by us from any equity capital raised, in excess of $1,000,000, after the closing date until such time as the CETCON Note is paid in full.

     Beginning December 21, 2007, the financial results of CETCON, Inc. were consolidated with those of our business. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, whereby a preliminary valuation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of the acquired business was performed as of December 20, 2007. The excess of the purchase price over net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired amounted to $944,220 and was recorded as goodwill. Other separately identifiable intangibles consisting of customer relationships and non-compete agreements amounted to an estimated aggregate fair value of $1,127,887. The preliminary estimates will be adjusted as necessary when the final valuation is completed.

Strategic Communications, Inc.

     On December 20, 2007, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Strategic Agreement”), our acquisition of selected assets Strategic Communications, LLC (“Strategic”) became effective. The Strategic Agreement was entered into between Beacon, Strategic and the members of Strategic, whereby we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of Strategic. Contemporaneously with the Strategic Agreement, Beacon, RFK Communications, LLC (“RFK”) (co- owner of Strategic Communications, Inc.) and the members of RFK entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement, whereby we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of RFK.

     Strategic was a voice, video and data communication systems solutions provider. Strategic specifically provided procurement for carrier services (including voice, video, data, Internet, local and long distance telephone applications), infrastructure services (including cabling and equipment); routers, servers and hubs; telephone systems, voicemail, general technology products and maintenance support. The Company acquired certain Strategic assets because it believes the business provides it with a customer base and presence in the greater Louisville, Kentucky region and an established presence in the market for products and services needed to design and implement these types of systems.

     The aggregate purchase price paid by Beacon, inclusive of direct transaction expenses, in connection with the Strategic acquisition amounted to $2,206,519, including 1,125,000 shares of common stock valued at $.85 per share, $220,500 of cash, a $562,500 secured promissory note (the “Strategic Secured Note”), a $342,000 promissory note (the “Strategic Escrow Note”) and direct transaction expenses of $125,269.

     We delivered the $342,000 Strategic Escrow Note (Note 10) and a stock certificate for 200,000 shares of the common stock conveyed to the members of Strategic as purchase consideration to be held in escrow (the “Strategic Escrow Shares”) for the purpose of securing the indemnification obligations of members of Strategic. The specific indemnity secures a commitment on the part of the sellers in this transaction to hold Beacon harmless from its previously existing liabilities, including a $313,000 tax delinquency, since Beacon agreed to assume only $500,000 of liabilities in the transaction. The escrow agreement will terminate and the Strategic Escrow Note and Strategic Escrow Shares will be released to the sellers upon confirmation that Strategic has settled the liabilities specified under such indemnification. If necessary, the amounts escrowed can be used to settle such liabilities.

20

     The Strategic Secured Note (Note 10) has a term of 60 months, bearing interest at 8% APR. The Strategic Secured Note provides for monthly principal and interest payments of $11,405. If, from the closing date to the first anniversary of the closing of this transaction, the revenue generated from Strategic is less than $4.5 million, the principal amount of the Strategic Secured Note will be reduced by percentage of the actual revenue divided by the minimum threshold. We believe that the minimum threshold provided for in the Strategic Secured Note for which there would be consideration payable is probable. Accordingly, the full principal amount of the Strategic Secured Note is included in the purchase consideration paid to the seller as of the closing date of the acquisition. We may prepay all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest under the Strategic Secured Note. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made payments of $34,216 and $68,433 on this note representing $23,585 and $46,705 of principal and $10,631 and $21,728 of interest, respectively.

     The Strategic Escrow Note bears interest at the Federal short term rate (4% as of June 30, 2008) and matures on the earlier of the final round of equity financing (as that term is defined in the Strategic Escrow Note) or December 31, 2008 (the “Maturity Date”), at which time the entire principal and accrued interest will be due and payable. The Company may prepay all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest under the Strategic Escrow Note. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay interest and penalties that Strategic incurs related to a tax liability it incurred prior to the acquisition. The acquired assets were encumbered by an aggregate of $313,000 of tax liens as of the time of the closing of this transaction; however Strategic, as the seller in this transaction, is still the primary obligor of this liability and is still therefore primarily liable for payment of the entire balance, including penalties and interest. As described in Note 17, the remaining amount of the liens of approximately $281,000 was settled on July 1, 2008 pursuant to an agreement by and among Strategic Communications LLC, Beacon, and the Internal Revenue Service. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company paid and settled $81,383 and $158,330 of obligations to taxing authorities on behalf of Strategic Communications, its former owners and principals to settle state and local tax liens, as well as payments to settle portions of outstanding federal tax obligations payable at the time of the acquisition.

     Beginning December 21, 2007, the day immediately following the effective date of the transaction, the financial results of Strategic were consolidated with those of our business. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, whereby a preliminary valuation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was performed as of December 20, 2007. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired amounted to $723,509 and was recorded as goodwill, subsequently adjusted to $773,794 as of June 30, 2008, upon continued review of the estimate fair values of the assets purchased and liabilities assumed in the transaction. Other separately identifiable intangibles consisting of customer relationships, non-compete agreements and tradenames amounted to an estimated aggregate fair value of $1,340,400. The preliminary estimates will be adjusted as necessary when the final valuation is completed.

Business Combination Accounting

     The Company accounted for its acquisitions of ADSnetcurve, Bell-Haun, CETCON and Strategic using the purchase method of accounting prescribed under SFAS 141 "Business Combinations." Under the purchase method, the acquiring enterprise records any purchase consideration issued to the sellers of the acquired business at their fair values. The aggregate of the fair value of the purchase consideration plus any direct transaction expenses incurred by the acquiring enterprise is allocated to the assets acquired (including any separately identifiable intangibles) and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of cost of the acquired entities over the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The results of operations for each of the acquired companies following the dates of each of the business combination (which was December 20, 2007) are included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2008. The Company evaluated each of the aforementioned transactions to identify the acquiring entity as required under SFAS 141 for business combinations effected through an exchange of equity interests. Based on such

21

evaluation the Company determined that it was the acquiring entity in each transaction (and cumulatively for all transactions) as (1) the larger portion of the relative voting rights in each of the acquired business and in the combined business as a whole was retained by the existing Beacon stockholders, (2) there are no significant minority interests or organized groups of interests carried over from the acquired entities that could exercise significant influence over the operating policies or management decisions of the combined entity, (3) the sellers in each of these transactions have no participation on the board of directors nor are they involved in any corporate governance functions of the combined entity and (4) a majority of the Senior Management positions in the combined entity, including those of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer, were retained by officers of Beacon both prior and subsequent to the business combination .The following table provides a breakdown of the purchase prices of each of the acquired businesses including the fair value of purchase consideration issued to the sellers of the acquired business and direct transaction expenses incurred by the Company in connection with consummating these transactions:

     The fair value of common stock issued to the sellers as purchase consideration was determined to be $.85 per share based on the selling prices of equity securities issued by the Company in the Private Placement Transaction described in Note 14. The fair value of note obligations issued to the sellers as purchase consideration is considered to be equal to their principal amounts because such notes feature interest rates that are deemed to be comparable for instruments of similar credit risk. Transaction expenses, which include legal fees and transaction advisory services directly related to the acquisitions amounted to approximately $630,000. Such fees included legal, accounting and business broker fees paid in cash.

     The Company also evaluated all post combination payments payable or potentially payable to the sellers of the acquired business as either contingent consideration or compensation under applicable employment agreements to determine their proper characterization in accordance with EITF 95-8 “Accounting for Contingent Consideration Issued in a Purchase Business Combination.” The Company determined that potential contingent consideration payable to certain sellers of the acquired businesses upon the attainment of certain pre-defined financial milestones should be accounted for as additional purchase consideration because there are no future services required on the part of such sellers in order for them to be entitled to those payments. In addition, the Company deems these payments to be a component of the implied value of the acquired businesses for which payment would be made based on financial performance. Conversely, any payments to be made to certain sellers of the acquired businesses under their respective employment agreements are deemed to be compensation for post combination services because such payments, which management believes are comparable to amounts for similar employment services, require the continuation of post-combination employment services.

Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation

     Under the purchase method of accounting, the total preliminary purchase price was allocated to each of the acquired entities, net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of December 20, 2007. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price for these four acquisitions is set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill.

22

     The purchase price allocation is preliminary, based on management's estimates and has not yet been finalized. The Company considered its intention for future use of the acquired assets, analyses of the historical financial performance of each of the acquired businesses and estimates of future performance of each acquired businesses' products and services in deriving the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company's final determination of the purchase price allocation could result in changes to the amounts reflected in its preliminary estimate and estimated useful lives of acquired assets.

Pro-Forma Financial Information

     The unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the Company and ADSnetcurve, Bell-Haun, CETCON and Strategic, on a pro-forma basis, as if the companies had been combined as of the beginning of each of the periods presented.

     The unaudited pro-forma financial information for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 combines the historical results of Beacon for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and the historical results of ADSnetcurve, Bell-Haun, CETCON and Strategic for the same period. The acquisitions of the businesses were completed on December 20, 2007. Accordingly, the results of the acquired companies were fully consolidated with those of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The unaudited pro-forma financial results for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 combines the historical results of ADSnetcurve, Bell-Haun, CETCON and Strategic with those of the Company as if these acquisitions had been completed as of the beginning of each of the periods presented. The pro-forma weighted average number of shares outstanding also assumes that the Share Exchange Transaction and Series A Private Placement described in Note 1 was completed as of the beginning of each of the periods presented.

23

     The unaudited pro-forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisitions of these businesses had taken place at the beginning of each of the periods presented.

NOTE 5 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

     Accounts receivable amounted to approximately $1,398,000 consisting of gross receivables of approximately $1,448,000 less an allowance for doubtful accounts of $50,000 as of June 30, 2008. The Company and its predecessor businesses have historically experienced minimal credit losses. However, credit risk has increased due to market conditions and an allowance for doubtful accounts has been established as an estimate of potential losses due to market conditions.

NOTE 6 – INVENTORY, NET

Inventory consists of the following as of June 30, 2008:

     A substantial amount of the inventory includes parts and system components for phone systems that the Company uses to fulfill repair, maintenance services and/or upgrade requirements. A portion of these items, which are stated at their net realizable value, are likely to be used after the next twelve months and are therefore presented as non-current inventory in the accompanying balance sheet. A significant portion of the inventory on hand at June 30, 2008 was acquired in the business combinations completed on December 20, 2007, which are stated at net realizable value using the purchase method of accounting. The Company has established a reserve for obsolete inventory as phone systems for which we carry spare parts are discontinued and diminish in the marketplace.

NOTE 7 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment consist of the following as of June 30, 2008:

     Property and equipment includes $20,541 of vehicles financed under capital lease obligations that the Company assumed in its acquisitions of Strategic Communications. Depreciation and amortization amounted $23,571 and $44,749 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008.

NOTE 8 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

24

     The following table is a summary of the intangible assets acquired in business combinations as described in Note 4:

     The above noted intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis. Customer relationships are being amortized over a 10 year useful life, contracts not to compete are being amortized over a 2 year useful life and tradenames are being amortized over a 5 year useful life, based on the estimated economic benefit.

The following is a summary of amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter:

     The values of the goodwill and intangible assets and the estimated useful lives are preliminary based on estimates made by management using the purchase method of accounting described in Note 4. These amounts are subject to change upon the final determination of the purchase price allocations described in Note 4.

NOTE 9 – ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consist of the following at June 30, 2008:

NOTE 10 – NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG TERM DEBT

Bridge Financing Transactions

25

     On July 16, 2007, the Company entered into a $500,000 Bridge Financing Facility provided by two of its founding stockholders who are also directors of the Company. The terms of the facility provide for the founding stockholders/directors to make up to $500,000 of advances to the Company on a discretionary basis at any time prior to the closing of an equity offering in which gross proceeds are at least $4,000,000 (the “Qualified Offering”). As of June 30, 2008, the entire facility had been drawn down of which $278,000 of the proceeds were received prior to September 30, 2007 and the remaining $222,000 of proceeds were received during the three months ended December 31, 2007.

     Advances under this facility bear interest at the Prime Rate (5.00% as of June 30, 2008) per annum and were to originally mature (i) in the event a Qualified Offering did not occur on or prior to December 31, 2007, on December 31, 2007; or (ii) in the event a Qualified Offering occurred prior to December 31, 2007, on demand at any time following the completion of the offering but not more than twenty-four (24) months after the date of the closing of the Qualified Offering. Certain warrants described below that we issued to the note holders would vest for each month repayment is deferred. In December 2007, the Company was informed that only a portion of the Private Placement described in Note 14 (which would have satisfied the requirement to complete a Qualified Offering) would be completed by December 31, 2007. Based on this development, the note holders agreed, on December 28, 2007, not to demand repayment of the notes before the completion of the Private Placement or December 31, 2008, whichever came first. On May 15, 2008, the noteholders agreed not to demand repayment of the notes before the completion of an offering in which the Company raises at least $3 million of additional equity financing or April 1, 2009, whichever comes first. Accordingly, the notes are included in current liabilities at June 30, 2008.

     As of June 30, 2008, the notes are convertible into our common stock at a conversion price equal to $.60 per share, or into the number and type of such equity securities into which the shares otherwise issuable upon such conversion are converted or exchanged under the terms of a merger, exchange or reorganization consummated by the Company prior to or at the time of a Qualified Offering. Unpaid principal is payable in cash or stock at the option of the holder if the conversion option is effected and all unpaid accrued interest is payable in cash only.

     We evaluated the conversion option stipulated in the Bridge Financing Facility to determine whether it requires immediate accounting recognition and whether under SFAS 133, such conversion feature should be bifurcated from its host instrument and accounted for as a free standing derivative in accordance with EITF 00-19. In performing this analysis, we determined that the conversion option, which is fixed and therefore conventional under EITF 05-2, provides the founding stockholders/directors with the right to convert any advances outstanding under the Bridge Financing Facility into shares of our common stock at anytime upon or after the completion of a Qualified Offering. The Private Placement was completed on February 12, 2008. The conversion option was out-of-the-money, having a fair value of common stock $0.002 per share (as compared to an exercise price of $0.60 per share) as of the commitment date of July 16, 2007 and therefore is not considered beneficial.

     In connection with the issuance of the Bridge Financing Facility, we issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock (the “Warrants”). The Warrants allow the holders to purchase up to 865,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, of which 625,000 are immediately exercisable. The remaining 240,000 Warrants (the “Contingent Bridge Facility Warrants”) vest and become exercisable at a rate of 10,000 shares on the 15^th of each month from the date of a Qualified Offering until the maturity date of the Bridge Financing Facility for each month that the demand for payment is deferred. Upon full conversion of the advances into shares of Beacon common stock or upon the final maturity date, all remaining unvested Contingent Bridge Facility Warrants will automatically vest and become exercisable. If the founding stockholders/directors require prepayment of the advances after the completion of a Qualified Offering but prior to the final maturity date, all remaining unvested Warrants will be forfeited and canceled. The Warrants expire on June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2008, 50,000 Warrants had vested under the terms of the Bridge Financing Facility. The value of the Warrants was nominal as of the commitment date of July 16, 2007 and therefore did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated results of operations.

     The fair value of the 625,000 exercisable Warrants, which amounted to $0, was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions relating to the estimated fair value of the Warrants are as follows: fair value of common stock of $.002 on the commitment date of July 16, 2007; risk-free interest rate of 4.95%; expected dividend yield of zero percent; life of five years; and current volatility of 66.34% .

26

     The final closing of the Private Placement was completed on February 12, 2008. Accordingly, the founding stockholders/directors have the right to demand repayment of these notes in cash at any time after February 12, 2008. From the date of the final closing of the Private Placement on February 12, 2008, the founding stockholders/directors may also (at their option) convert the outstanding principal into 833,333 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share and receive cash payment of accrued and unpaid interest. In addition to the above, vesting commenced on the Contingent Bridge Facility Warrants on February 12, 2008. We recorded $18,000 and $32,600 of non-cash interest expense related to the 30,000 and 50,000 Contingent Bridge Facility Warrants that vested and became exercisable during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The fair value of the vested Contingent Bridge Facility Warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model as detailed in the following table:

     We recorded $6,420 and $21,368 of contractual interest expense under this arrangement for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, of which $14,520 is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

     On November 15, 2007, we issued $200,000 of convertible notes payable (the “Bridge Notes”) in a separate debt financing. Of this amount, $100,000 of the Bridge Notes was issued to one of the directors of Beacon. These Bridge Notes were issued under terms substantially identical to the terms stipulated under the Bridge Financing Facility described above. The holders of the Bridge Notes also agreed, on December 28, 2007, not to demand repayment of these notes before the completion of the Private Placement described in Note 14 or December 31, 2008, whichever came first. The effect of the change in the maturity dates of these notes was insignificant to the Company’s financial results. Accordingly, these notes are due on demand anytime after the completion of the Private Placement described in Note 14, which occurred on February 12, 2008. On March 15, 2008, the noteholders agreed not to demand repayment of the notes before the completion of an offering in which the Company raises at least $3 million of additional equity financing or April 1, 2009, whichever comes first. Accordingly, the notes are included in current liabilities at June 30, 2008.

     We evaluated the conversion option stipulated in the Bridge Notes (which has terms identical to the conversion option featured in the Bridge Financing Facility described above) to determine whether it requires immediate accounting recognition and whether under SFAS 133, such conversion feature should be bifurcated from its host instrument and accounted for as a free standing derivative in accordance with EITF 00-19. In performing this analysis, we determined that the conversion option, which is fixed and therefore conventional under EITF 05-2, provides the founding stockholders/directors with the right to convert any advances outstanding under the Bridge Notes into shares of our common stock at anytime upon or after the completion of the Qualified Offering on February 12, 2008.

     In connection with the issuance of the Bridge Notes, we also issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock (the “Note Warrants”). The Note Warrants allow the holders to purchase up to 346,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, of which 250,000 are immediately exercisable. The remaining 96,000 Note Warrants (the “Contingent Bridge Note Warrants”) vest and become exercisable at a rate of 4,000 shares per month from the date of a Qualified Offering (if completed) until the maturity date of the Bridge Notes for each month that the demand for repayment of the principal balance is deferred. Upon full conversion of the principal into shares of our common stock or upon the final maturity date, all remaining unvested Note Warrants will automatically vest and become exercisable. If the note holders require prepayment of the principal after the

27

completion of a Qualified Offering but prior to the final maturity date, all remaining unvested Note Warrants will be forfeited and canceled. The Warrants expire on June 30, 2012.

     The fair value of the 250,000 exercisable Warrants, which amounted to $112,500, was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions relating to the estimated fair value of the Warrants are as follows: fair value of common stock of $.85 on the commitment date of November 15, 2007; risk-free interest rate of 3.71%; expected dividend yield of zero percent; expected life of 1,689 days through June 30, 2012; and current volatility of 66.34% . Accordingly, we discounted the face value of the Bridge Notes to $128,000 and recorded an attributable equity value of $72,000 upon the original issuance of the Bridge Notes, in accordance with Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 14 “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants,” (“APB 14”). The discount related to the Bridge Note Warrants is being accreted over the estimated life of the Bridge Notes of 2.27 years from the date of issuance on November 15, 2007.

     The final closing of the Private Placement was completed on February 12, 2008. Accordingly, the holders of the Bridge Notes have the right to demand repayment of these notes in cash at any time after February 12, 2008 or convert, at their option, the outstanding principal into 333,333 shares of our common stock and receive cash payment of accrued and unpaid interest. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature of the Bridge Notes was determined to be approximately $0.47 per share or an aggregate of $156,169 representing more than 100% of the remaining undiscounted face value of the Bridge Notes. Accordingly, an additional discount of $128,000 to the face value of the Bridge Notes was recorded for the beneficial conversion feature of the Bridge Notes. The discount related to the beneficial conversion feature of the Bridge Notes will be accreted over the two-year contractual term of the Notes. In addition, vesting commenced on the Contingent Bridge Note Warrants on February 12, 2008.

     We recorded contractual interest expense of $2,568 and $7,601 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, under this arrangement of which $7,601 is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. In addition, we recorded accretion of the Bridge Note Warrant discount to fair value of $7,930 and $22,698 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. We recorded accretion of the discount of the remaining value of the Bridge Notes related to the beneficial conversion feature of the Bridge Notes of $15,999 and $24,533 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. We recorded $7,200 and $13,040 of non-cash interest expense related to the 12,000 and 20,000 Contingent Bridge Note Warrants that vested and became exercisable during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The fair value of the vested Contingent Bridge Note Warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model as detailed in the following table:

Line of Credit

     On June 11, 2008, the Company and Integra Bank entered into a credit facility, under which the Company borrowed $200,000 at a 6.00% annual interest rate the principal of which is payable on August 11, 2008. The proceeds of the note were used as short term working capital collateralized by certain customer engagements and the receivables expected to be generated there from. Cash collections related to the collateralized customer engagements will be used to repay the note.

Long Term Debt

The following is a summary of our long term debt:

28

Integra Bank

     On March 14, 2008, the Company and Integra Bank entered into a credit facility, under which the Company borrowed $600,000 at a 6.25% annual interest rate with monthly payments of $11,696 over a 60 month term that matures on March 12, 2013. The first payment was made on April 14, 2008. The proceeds of the note were used to repay the three previously outstanding notes assumed in the acquisitions, two of which were in default due to change in control provisions. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the new installment obligation to refinance $195,000 of previously outstanding indebtedness due to the same creditor. The effect of having refinanced the previous indebtedness with this same creditor was insignificant to the Company’s financial statements and therefore is not deemed to be a constructive extinguishment of the previous balance in accordance with EITF 96-19 “Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments.” Accordingly, no gain or loss has been recognized.

Acquisition Notes

     Notes payable with an aggregate value of $1,923,500 were issued as purchase consideration in our business combinations as described in Note 4. The terms of these notes, including provisions for partial acceleration in the event we raise additional equity capital in future financing transactions and optional prepayment provisions, are more fully described in Note 4.

     The following table summarizes the remaining debt principal payment obligations by year for the long-term debt other than the Bridge Financing Facility, Bridge Notes, and short term line of credit which are presumed to be paid within the next twelve months:

29

     Substantially all of the Company’s assets are pledged as collateral under its various debt obligations and tax liens pursuant to the Strategic acquisition as described in Notes 4 and 12.

NOTE 11 – CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

     The Company assumed capital lease obligations related to service vehicles in its acquisitions of Strategic Communications under which the aggregate present value of the minimum lease payments amounted to $16,496 as of June 30, 2008. In accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting for Leases” (“SFAS 13”), the present value of the minimum lease payments was calculated using discount rate of 5%. Lease payments, including amounts representing interest, amounted to approximately $1,725 and $5,175 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

Minimum lease payments due in years subsequent to June 30, 2008 are as follows:

NOTE 12 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

     On July 16, 2007, the Company entered into the $500,000 Bridge Financing Facility provided by two of its founding stockholders/directors (Notes 3 and 10).

     On November 15, 2007, the Company entered into a separate $100,000 bridge note with one of its directors (Notes 3 and 10).

     One of the Company’s founders also provides it with certain consulting services. There is no formal agreement between the Company and this founder. For the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded $75,169 of compensation expense paid in cash to the founder for consulting services provided, which is included in salaries and benefits in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations and a $60,000 fee for assisting in the successful execution of the Series A-1 Placement which was netted against the proceeds from the placement.

     The Company has obtained insurance through an agency owned by one of its founding stockholders/directors. Insurance expense paid through the agency for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $44,090 and is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

     On December 28, 2007, the Company entered into an equity financing arrangement with two of its directors that provided up to $300,000 of additional funding, the terms of which provided for compensation of 10,000 warrants to purchase common stock at $1.00 per share per month, for each individual for the period the financing arrangement was in effect. The warrants have a five-year term. The financing arrangement was terminated upon the close of the Series A-1 Placement. Accordingly, the Company recognized $0.00 and $58,700 of interest expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 based on the fair value of the warrants as they were earned. The fair values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

30

     On March 26, 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share with a five-year term to one of its directors. Accordingly, the Company recognized $219,000 of share-based compensation expense for nine months ended June 30, 2008 based on the fair value of the warrants on the grant date. The fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

     On May 15, 2008, the Company entered into an equity financing arrangement with one of its directors that provided up to $500,000 of additional funding, the terms of which provided for issuance of 33,333 warrants to purchase common stock at $1.00 per share per month for the period the financing arrangement is in effect. The warrants have a five-year term. The financing arrangement terminates upon the close of a $3,000,000 equity financing event. Accordingly, the Company recognized $19,333 of interest expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 based on the fair value of the warrants as they were earned. The fair values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment Agreements

     The Company has entered into employment agreements with three of its key executives with no specific expiration dates that provide for aggregate annual compensation of $480,000 and up to $120,000 of severance payments for termination without cause. In addition, the Company entered into employment agreements with five key employees of certain of the acquired businesses upon its completion of the business combinations described in Note 4. Aggregate compensation under these agreements amounts to $580,000. Two of these agreements expire on December 31, 2009 and the remaining three have no specified expiration date. These agreements also provide for aggregate severance payments of up to $326,000 for termination without cause.

Operating Leases

     The Company has entered into operating leases for office facilities in Louisville, KY, Columbus, OH and Cincinnati, OH. A summary of the minimum lease payments due on these operating leases exclusive of the Company’s share of operating expenses and other costs:

31

Strategic Communications Tax Liability

     As further described in Note 4, the assets acquired from Strategic Communications are encumbered by $313,000 of tax liens for delinquent sales and use, payroll and income taxes incurred by Strategic prior to the acquisition on December 20, 2007. The Company has agreed to pay, under certain conditions, interest and penalties accruing on these obligations subsequent to December 20, 2007, which amounts to approximately $7,400 as of June 30, 2008. Strategic, as the seller in this transaction, is still the primary obligor of these tax liabilities and is therefore primarily liable for payment of the entire balance, including penalties and interest. Through June 30, 2008, the Company has paid aggregate obligations related to local, state and federal tax liens of approximately $158,000 and has secured the release of all but the federal tax liens as of June 30, 2008. As described in Note 17, the remaining amount of the liens of approximately $281,000 was settled on July 1, 2008 pursuant to an agreement by and among Strategic Communications LLC, Beacon, and the Internal Revenue Service (Note 17).

Legal Proceedings

     On May 13, 2008, we received a letter from counsel for Uplink Technology, Inc. (“Uplink”), which had been in litigation with Strategic Communications LLC (“Strategic”) at the time we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Strategic. Uplink counsel claims Uplink and/or its principals are owed up to $420,000 by Strategic and demands that all net proceeds (including cash as well as our Common Stock) due by us to Strategic or its principals will continue to be held “in trust” pending the completion of the litigation between Strategic and Uplink. If we do not provide written confirmation by May 19, 2008 of our intention to do so, Uplink has stated that it will seek injunctive relief in order to obtain same. Subsequent to May 19, 2008, when Beacon had verbally responded to these issues through counsel, pursuant to discussions with counsel for Uplink, no action has been taken against Beacon nor do we expect any to be taken. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company cannot determine the outcome of this matter at this time. The Company is not currently a party to the litigation and management does not believe this situation will result in a material impact to our condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company cannot determine the outcome of this matter at this time and there is no assurance that the outcome will not have a material effect on the Company’s operations.

NOTE 14 – STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

Authorized Capital

     The Company is currently authorized to issue up to 70,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which three series have been designated: 4,500 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 1,000 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, and 4,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.

     Each share of Series A, Series A-1 and Series B preferred has voting rights equal to an equivalent number of common shares into which it is convertible. The holders of the Series A and Series A-1 are entitled to receive contractual cumulative dividends in preference to any dividend on the common stock at the rate of 10% per annum on the initial investment amount commencing on the date of issue. The holders of the Series B are entitled to receive contractual cumulative dividends in preference to any dividend on the common stock (but subject to the rights of the Series A and Series A-1) at the rate of 6% per annum on the initial investment amount commencing on the date of issue. Such dividends are payable on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year. Dividends accrued but unpaid with respect to this feature amounted to $94,904 and $5,450 as of June 30, 2008 for the Series A and A-1 preferred, respectively, and are presented as an increase in net loss available to the common stockholders of $93, 019 and $100,354 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. No dividends have yet

32

accrued on the Series B Preferred Stock. The Company has the option of paying the dividend in either common stock or cash.

     The Series A, A-1 and B Preferred Stock designation contains certain restrictive covenants including restrictions against: the declaration of dividend distributions to common stockholders; certain mergers, consolidations and business combinations; the issuance of preferred shares with rights or provisions senior to each of the Series A, A-1, and B Preferred Stock; and restrictions against incurring or assuming unsecured liabilities or indebtedness unless certain minimum performance objectives are satisfied. The Series A Preferred Stock is senior to the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and the Series A and A-1 are senior to the Series B Preferred Stock.

     The Series A, A-1 and B Preferred Stock also contains a right of redemption in the event of liquidation or a change in control. The redemption feature provides for payment of 125% of the face value and 125% of any accrued unpaid dividends in the event of bankruptcy, change of control, or any actions to take the Company private. The amount of the redemption preference was $5,118,630 and $1,006,813 for the Series A and A-1 preferred, respectively, as of June 30, 2008. No shares of Series B Preferred Stock had been issued as of June 30, 2008.

     The Company, by resolution of the Board of Directors, may designate additional series of Preferred Stock (“blank check preferred stock”) and to fix or alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon such blank check preferred stock, and the number of shares constituting any such series of such blank check preferred stock. The rights, privileges and preferences of any such blank check preferred stock shall be subordinate to the rights, privileges and preferences to the existing Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock was issued as “blank check preferred stock” and as such is subordinate to the rights, privileges and preferences of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

     The Board of Directors may also increase or decrease the number of shares of any series (other than the Series A Preferred Stock or the Series A-1 Preferred Stock), prior or subsequent to the issue of that series, but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding.

Private Placement of Convertible Preferred Stock

Series A Preferred Stock Placement

     During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, we issued in three Private Placement transactions, an aggregate of 4,000 shares of our Series A convertible preferred stock and five year common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share for net proceeds of $3,276,610 (gross proceeds of $4,000,000 less offering costs of $723,390). Offering costs included fees paid to the placement agent of $650,000 and legal and related expenses of $73,390 in addition to warrants granted to the placement agent to purchase 1,040,000 shares of our common stock at $1.00 per share with a 5 year term. An additional 600,000 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock at $1.00 per share with a 5 year term were earned by and issued to affiliates of the placement agent. The Series A is convertible into common stock at any time, at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $.75 per share. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, dilutive issuances and other anti-dilution provisions, including circumstances in which we, at our discretion, issue equity securities or convertible instruments that feature prices lower than the conversion price specified in the Series A preferred shares. The Series A is also automatically convertible into shares of our common stock, at the then applicable conversion price upon the closing of a firm commitment underwritten public offering of shares of our common stock yielding aggregate proceeds of not less than $20 million or under certain other circumstances when the trading volume and average trading prices of the stock attain certain specified levels.

     As described in Note 1, we evaluated the conversion options embedded in the Series A securities to determine (in accordance with SFAS 133 and EITF 00-19) whether they should be bifurcated from their host instruments and accounted for as separate derivative financial instruments. We determined, in accordance with SFAS 133, that the risks and rewards of the common shares underlying the conversion feature are clearly and

33

closely related to those of the host instrument. Accordingly the conversion features are being accounted for as embedded conversion options in accordance with EITF 98-5 and EITF 00-27. During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, based on an evaluation of the beneficial conversion feature of the Series A Preferred Shares, the Company recorded deemed dividends of $2,483,715. The table below lists the detailed fair value of the warrants issued in each of the three closings of the Series A Preferred Stock Private Placement. The fair values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

     Accordingly, deemed dividends related to the conversion feature were recorded based on the difference between the effective conversion price of the conversion option and the fair value of the common stock at the commitment date of the transaction detailed in the table below.

     The Company has reserved 5,333,333 shares of its common stock for issuance upon the conversion of its Series A convertible preferred stock and 2,666,666 shares of its common stock for issuance upon exercise of the Investor Warrants.

     As described in Note 1, the Company applies the classification and measurement principles enumerated in EITF Topic D-98 with respect to accounting for its issuances of the Series A preferred stock. The Company is required, under Nevada law, to obtain the approval of its board of directors in order to effectuate a merger, consolidation or similar event resulting in a more than 50% change in control or a sale of all or substantially all of its assets. The board of directors is then required to submit proposals to enter into these types of transactions to its stockholders for their approval by majority vote. The preferred stockholders do not currently (i) control or have representation on the Company’s Board of Directors and/or (ii) have sufficient voting rights to control a redemption of these shares by either of these events. In addition the effectuation of any transaction or series of transactions resulting in a more than 50% change in control can be made only by the Company in its sole discretion. Based on these provisions, we classified the Series A preferred shares as permanent equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet because the liquidation events are deemed to be within the Company’s sole control in accordance with the provisions of EITF Topic D-98.

     We evaluate the Series A convertible preferred stock at each reporting date for appropriate balance sheet classification.

34

Series A-1 Preferred Stock Placement

     On March 7 and 11, 2008, the Company issued, in two closing of a Private Placement transaction, an aggregate of 800 shares of its Series A-1 convertible preferred stock and 533,333 five year common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share for net proceeds of $599,850 (gross proceeds of $800,000 less offering costs of $200,150). Offering costs included fees paid to the placement agent of $104,000, a fee for the successful completion of the placement of $60,000 paid to a related party and $36,150 in legal and relate fees in addition to warrants to purchase 208,000 shares of our common stock at $1.00 per share with a 5 year term. The Series A-1 Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at any time, at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $.75 per share. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, dilutive issuances and other anti-dilution provisions, including circumstances in which we, at our discretion, issue equity securities or convertible instruments that feature prices lower than the conversion price specified for shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. The Series A-1 Preferred Stock is also automatically convertible into shares of our common stock, at the then applicable conversion price upon the closing of a firm commitment underwritten public offering of shares of our common stock yielding aggregate proceeds of not less than $20 million or under certain other circumstances when the trading volume and average trading prices of the stock attain certain specified levels.

     As described in Note 1, we evaluated the conversion options embedded in the Series A-1 securities to determine (in accordance with SFAS 133 and EITF 00-19) whether they should be bifurcated from their host instruments and accounted for as separate derivative financial instruments. We determined, in accordance with SFAS 133, that the risks and rewards of the common shares underlying the conversion feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host instrument. Accordingly the conversion features are being accounted for as embedded conversion options in accordance with EITF 98-5 and EITF 00-27. During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, based on an evaluation of the beneficial conversion feature of the Series A-1 Preferred Shares, the Company recorded deemed dividends of $1,411,882. The table below lists the fair value of the warrants issued in each of the two closings of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock Private Placement. The fair values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

     Accordingly, deemed dividends related to the conversion feature were recorded based on the difference between the effective conversion price of the conversion option and the fair value of the common stock at the commitment date of the transaction detailed in the table below.